Embarking on the journey to immigrate to Canada is a complex endeavor, marked by various considerations, one of the most pivotal being adherence to inadmissibility rules. Medical inadmissibility is a significant factor that can impact the eligibility of individuals applying to visit, study, work, or seek permanent residence in Canada. This comprehensive guide aims to delve into the intricacies of medical inadmissibility, providing detailed insights into the three primary reasons for refusal—danger to public health, danger to public safety, and excessive demand on health or social services.

Understanding Inadmissibilities

A Canadian immigration officer holds the authority to determine your admissibility to Canada, whether you’re applying for a visa, an Electronic Travel Authorization (eTA), or presenting yourself at a port of entry. In cases where inadmissibility is established, it results in the denial of a visa or an Electronic Travel Authorization (eTA), refusal of entry, or removal from Canada.

There are several reasons for inadmissibility, including:

  • Inadmissibility may be caused for security reasons, involving activities like espionage, subversion, violence, terrorism, or association with groups participating in such acts.
  • Violations of human or international rights, such as war crimes, crimes against humanity, or holding a senior position in a government engaged in gross human rights violations or subject to international sanctions, can lead to inadmissibility.
  • Criminal engagement encompasses a range of offences, from driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol to involvement in organized crime, including membership in groups participating in criminal activities, people smuggling, or money laundering.
  • Medical factors include conditions that pose risks to public health or safety or result in an excessive demand on health or social services, with specific exemptions for certain applicants.
  • Financial challenges, indicating an inability or unwillingness to provide financial support for oneself and family members, may lead to inadmissibility.
  • Misrepresentation, involving the provision of false information or withholding pertinent details related to decisions made under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), is another ground for inadmissibility.
  • Non-compliance with any provision of IRPA or having a family member deemed inadmissible can contribute to the extensive factors leading to inadmissibility, highlighting the thoroughness of the immigration screening process.

These multifaceted reasons contribute to the broader spectrum of inadmissibility, reinforcing the meticulous nature of the immigration screening process.

Understanding Medical Inadmissibility

Medical inadmissibility is a meticulous screening process integral to Canadian immigration, ensuring the safeguarding of public health and safety. This evaluation applies to individuals seeking to visit, study or move to Canada, necessitating a detailed examination of their medical history and potential impact on the country’s resources.

1. Danger to Public Health:

The refusal of an application under the umbrella of danger to public health occurs when an individual’s health condition is deemed to pose a threat to the overall health of Canada’s population. This determination is closely tied to the results of the immigration medical exam, a pivotal component in assessing an applicant’s admissibility.

Factors considered include:

  • Results of the immigration medical exam.
  • Laboratory test results conducted by designated third-party physicians.
  • Specialist reports requested by medical officers.
  • Presence of infectious diseases, such as active tuberculosis or syphilis.
  • Close contact with individuals carrying infectious diseases.
  • The potential impact of the disease on residents of Canada.

The evaluation of danger to public health requires an in-depth analysis of the applicant’s health condition, with a focus on its potential implications on a broader scale.

2. Danger to Public Safety:

Danger to public safety serves as another criterion for the refusal of an application if an individual’s health condition is perceived to endanger public safety. This evaluation, much like the danger to public health, is grounded in the results of the immigration medical exam.

The assessment considers the risk of:

  • Sudden incapacity leading to the loss of physical and mental abilities.
  • unforeseeable or violent behavior.

3. Excessive Demand on Health or Social Services:

Excessive demand on health or social services represents the third facet of medical inadmissibility, wherein an application may be rejected if the applicant’s health condition is deemed likely to place an undue strain on Canada’s resources. This assessment is grounded in the results of the immigration medical exam.

Key considerations for excessive demand include:

  • Whether the required health or social services for your health condition would have an adverse impact on service wait times in Canada.
  • Whether the essential services to address and handle your health condition would exceed the established excessive demand cost threshold.

The excessive demand cost threshold for 2023 is set at $128,445 over 5 years, or $25,689 annually. This financial benchmark is instrumental in determining if an applicant’s health condition poses an excessive burden on Canada’s health and social services.

Exceptions to Medical Inadmissibility Rules:

While medical inadmissibility rules are stringent, certain categories are exempt from these criteria. Refugees and their dependants, protected persons, and individuals being sponsored by their family, such as dependant children, spouses, and common-law partners, are exceptions to the medical inadmissibility rules for excessive demand reasons.

These exceptions recognize the unique circumstances and vulnerability of certain groups, ensuring a balanced and compassionate approach within the immigration system.

Procedural Fairness Letter:

When an applicant is flagged for potential medical inadmissibility, the immigration authorities issue a procedural fairness letter prior to making a decision. This letter serves as a communication tool, explaining the reasons for concern and offering the applicant an opportunity to respond before a final decision is made.

The procedural fairness letter provides a window for applicants to:

  • Submit additional information regarding their health condition or medical diagnosis.
  • Provide details on any treatment received to cure or improve their health condition.
  • Outline the kind of medication and services required.
  • Specify the cost of medications or services needed.

Applicants are granted a 90-day period from the date of the letter to respond. It is imperative to note that failure to respond within this timeframe requires contacting immigration authorities to request an extension.

Mitigation Plan:

In cases where an applicant’s health condition is anticipated to cause an excessive demand on Canada’s health or social services, immigration authorities may invite the individual to submit a mitigation plan. This invitation is extended based on the specific circumstances of the applicant.

A mitigation plan serves as a strategic document wherein the applicant outlines measures to mitigate the potential strain on Canada’s resources. This could involve detailing specific steps, treatment plans, or financial arrangements aimed at alleviating the impact of the health condition.

Preparing a mitigation plan requires careful consideration and often necessitates a tailored approach, acknowledging the unique aspects of the applicant’s health condition and its potential consequences.


In conclusion, the journey of immigration to Canada entails a comprehensive understanding of various factors influencing admissibility, notably medical inadmissibility. Medical inadmissibility, specifically, encompasses danger to public health, danger to public safety, and excessive demand on health or social services. Exceptions exist for vulnerable groups, and procedural fairness letters provide applicants flagged for medical inadmissibility an opportunity to respond. For cases of anticipated excessive demand, a mitigation plan may be invited. Navigating this complex landscape is imperative for successful immigration, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of the intricacies of medical inadmissibility.

At Kozyrev Law, we offer expert legal services to guide individuals through the intricate landscape of medical inadmissibility in the Canadian immigration process. Our seasoned professionals understand the complexities associated with public health, safety, and potential demands on Canadian resources, ensuring thorough support for applicants. Whether addressing security concerns, financial challenges, or responding to procedural fairness letters, we provide comprehensive assistance. Our commitment extends to navigating the nuanced aspects of medical inadmissibility, offering tailored strategies and mitigation plans when necessary. With Kozyrev Law, clients benefit from a dedicated team, ensuring a thorough and informed approach to successfully navigate the intricacies of medical inadmissibility and enhance the prospects of a successful immigration journey to Canada.

Request A Free Consultation
Take the first step towards a brighter future for your family - talk to our family lawyer in North York now.

    Disclaimer: Any information on this website does not constitute legal advice

    What Are Clients Saying?

    Valeriy Kozyrev was a true beacon of hope in what my family believed was an outright impossible situation. His professional and knowledgeable presence in the end was all that was needed for us to finally get the new beginning we had been hoping for. My family is eternally grateful for his service and support!
    Ivy Sabeghi
    Mr Kozyrev was fantastic in presenting our immigration appeal. He is very knowledgeable and super easy to work with. Thank you so very much.
    Karin Sousa
    Best recommendation. Professional services.
    Alexander Leontiev
    Shirin dokht


    With effect from March 1, 2021, the word ‘custody’ has been replaced by concepts which are more centered with the relation with the children, such as decision making responsibility, parenting time and contact. Let’s dive into this topic today from a family lawyer perspective. Decision making responsibility When two partners separate, a question of care […]
    September 11, 2023
    5 months
    First of all, let’s determine the general term. For the purpose of child support, a child is someone who: Any person who is qualified under these requirements, is a ‘child’ entitled to child support from his/her parents. This is the situation in which you might need to ask for the help of a family lawyer.  […]
    September 5, 2023
    6 months
    Who is a spouse according to Ontario common law? Spousal support is payable to, but not limited to, a spouse. As stated, spousal support is not contingent merely upon a matrimonial bond. Other cases in which a person can claim spousal support are, either when the parties cohabited with each other for more than 3 […]
    August 27, 2023
    6 months